January 22, 2009

Red Herring

red herring
- noun
2. something intended to divert attention from the real problem or matter at hand; a misleading clue
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This term gets used a lot in both politics and financial discussions.  Creating something that is simply not true just to divert one's attention from what's important seems to be a good way of simply saying, "I really don't want this to happen"

Case in point.  Barack Obama.  While 52% of the registered voters that actually voted picked him to be our next president, there was a good amount of people that didn't.  At least 40%.  And while the Maverick and his Alaskan running mate went back to their respective states, Mr. Obama went to Washington.

Ok.  Said and done, he's now our Commander-in-Chief, put aside your differences and let's start moving forward together.

Nope.

These arbitrators of herrings that are red in color decide that there's got to be a way to kick this guy out of office.  They tried to keep him out during the election, calling into question the validity of his US citizenship.  More on that in a bit.

So during Tuesday's inauguration proceedings, there's a part that takes place at exactly 12 noon.  It's the Oath of Office.  And it's pretty specific.  Certain words have to be said and in a certain order.  This is the leader of the free world we are talking about here.

So President-Elect Obama is standing at the podium with Chief Justice Roberts, who is there to conduct the big important business of swearing in a new president.  It's a couple of minutes past 12 noon.  It's cold out.  And I'm sure there's a lot of nerves in jumbles.  This is a big moment and a big deal.

Roberts starts out, Obama starts to repeat after him and jumps ahead.  Roberts gets distracted and there's a few words that are not repeated in the proper order.

Not a problem.  They correct themselves, get back on track and finish the Oath proceedings.  It's now official, we have a new president.

But wait.

That's right.  The lovers of all herrings red speak out.

"He's not really president...  they didn't stay it right."

"It was said a few minutes past 12 noon.  It's not official."

"The words were not spoken in the correct order....  Obama needs to step down"

Wha?  Huh?  Are you serious?

Last year, around mid-August, the red herring detractors came out of the woodwork.  They were questioning Obama's citizenship credentials.  In summary, they were doing their best to invalidate his qualifications for being president due to his birth certificate being a fake.

They spent endless amounts of time, energy, blog posts, Google searches and Photoshop editing making sure that they were right.  It was their goal to make sure Barack Obama was not going to "go against the Constitution" and to never take office, let alone even get a chance to be on the ballot on November 4th.

"It's a fake, the lettering is not right."

"He never lived in Hawaii"

"His father wasn't a naturalized citizen"

"His mother left the country after he was born"

And there were many other detailed and outlandish reasons why Obama shouldn't be eligible to be president.  Some even went as far as to suggest that this was one of the greatest conspiracies to happen to the United States.

Yep, 46 years in the making, before Barack Hussein Obama was born, there were some that plotted this out, carefully making alterations to his birth certificate.  Secretly throwing out valid documents.  Changing the laws so that every person with a red herring mission couldn't order a copy of the birth certificate.  Making sure that one day, in 2008, Barack could become a candidate for president, and making history.

Give me a fucking break.

Let's get this straight, people.

There was no conspiracy.

There are no faked birth certificates, except for the hundreds stored on the blogs and hard drives of red herring mongers.

Regardless of the location of his parents after his birth, Barack Obama's eligibility for the office of president met each and every requirement.

Enough, people.

Read this link if you are still clinging onto this utter and complete bullshit:


Just Stop
And so it continues today with "Flubbergate".  Which, by the way, was properly repeated on the first day in office.  Crisis avoided.

But don't worry.  There will be further red herrings drummed up in order to find a way to remove President Obama from office.  Which is simply another way of distracting from the real goal, and that is unity.  Removing divides and walls and coming together for the common good of everyone.  Putting aside partisan politics and trying to solve current problems instead of creating new ones.

So please, I beg of you.  Stop with these red herrings.  Get over your selfish nature and put aside whatever it is that bothers you that there's no Ultra Conservative Right-Wing President in office.  We have someone who has the chance - and wants the chance - to make this country a better place to live.  Let him at least try to make good on his campaign promises for the next 48 months before you start finding ways to run him out of town.

Thank you.  The world is watching.

4 comments:

  1. Take the test.

    FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?

    ANSWER: Joe Biden

    Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)

    This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.

    SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?

    ANSWER: Hillary Clinton

    One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.

    THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?

    ANSWER: Yet undetermined.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the Presidential history lesson, Ted. You are correct about Joe Biden being president for those 5 minutes, and you are correct in that until Obama did the official Oath exactly as it needed to be, Biden was considered acting president.

    While you and the thousands of others that want Obama out of office, wait for the Supreme Court to rule in your favor, can you please explain to be me, the clearness of Article II, Clause 5 of the Constitution, on the eligibility requirements to be President and how this invalidates Obama?

    If it's so clear that Obama is not a natural born citizen, as you state in your comment, then why does the supreme court need to rule on it?

    If it's such a clear rule, then why has the supreme court in previous "natural born citizenship" cases (7 of them, from 1857 to 1971) been more clear in their rulings?

    What evidence do you think someone like Philip Berg will have if this case actually makes it to the supreme court?

    FOURTH QUESTION: If John McCain would have been elected president, would you also be going to these great efforts and details in trying to remove him from office, challenging his "natural born citizen" status?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you fucking kidding me? Here's another question, if the letter is what is to be followed: Who was the 43rd President of the United States?

    Answer: Al Gore, that's who.

    And the Seahawks won Superbowl XL too, damnit. Even Ben Roethlisberger thinks we were robbed.

    I'm so, so relieved and happy that Obama is our President. Definitively, legally, technically, in every conceivable way. These thin, cheesy, ridiculous efforts will make no headway whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with you, Catherine... If there really was an issue or a true concern, you would think someone would have figured it out months and years ago, not a few months before the election.

    Plus, like a buzzard watching a rodent cross the highway, these internet conspiracy theorists are just waiting for the slightest slip up to claim their stake, wishing they could drive it through the Obama presidency.

    So where were these people during the 8 years of Bush? Why dod they only go after a Democrat?

    BTW, love that link to the Gore article. Too bad he only got 40 days in office.

    ReplyDelete